Predicting Survival Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy In Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Recursive Partitioning Analysis To Define Subgroups


Abstract

Alexander Louie1, George Rodrigues2, Cornelis Haasbeek1, Andrew Warner2, Frank Lagerwaard1, David Palma2, Ben Slotman1, Suresh Senan1
1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON

Purpose: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is now a guideline-specified curative treatment modality for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This analysis was undertaken to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) in these patients using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA).

Materials and Methods: Our institution maintains a database on lung tumour patients treated with both SABR and hypofractionated radiotherapy. Details on baseline characteristics, treatment, and follow-up information are prospectively entered. SABR was delivered using a risk-adapted scheme of 54 Gy in 3 fractions, 55 Gy in 5 fractions, 60 Gy in 8 fractions, and the hypofractionated scheme used with stereotactic on-line setup was 60 Gy in 12 fractions, all based on tumour size and location. The following categories of patients were excluded: previous lung cancer, other synchronous malignancies, multiple lung tumours, and those without 18-FDG PET staging. 676 Stage I NSCLC patients treated between 2003 and 2012 remained eligible for analysis, consisting of both medically inoperable and potentially operable patients, with the latter defined by criteria described previously [Lagerwaard 2012]. Patients were randomly dividing into a training set (n=451, 67%) and a validation set (n=225, 33%). In the training set, 22 unique parameters consisting of various patient, treatment, and tumour factors were entered into a model where recursive partitioning was used to prognosticate for OS. After selection of a clinically appropriate model, classes developed in the training set were applied to stratify patients from the validation set. The log-rank test was used to determine differences in OS among the RPA classes for the validation and training sets. 

Results: At a median follow up of 25.5 months (range 0.9-113.9), the median OS for the entire cohort was 51.3 months. RPA identified six risk classes: class I - potentially operable and PTV < 45 cc; class II - potentially operable and PTV > 45 cc; class III - medically inoperable and diameter < 2.4cm and age <76; class IV: medically inoperable and diameter <2.4cm and age >76; class V: medically inoperable, diameter >2.4 and BED10 >100 Gy; and class VI medically inoperable, diameter >2.4 and BED10 <100 Gy. In the training set, median OS was not reached for class I, and for classes II-VI were 58.7, 44.0, 25.8, 20.5, and 10.0 months, respectively. The RPA model could significantly discriminate between risk classes in both the training and validation sets (p<0.0001). Overall survival in the validation set correlated closely with survival in the training set. 

Conclusions: This validated model demonstrates that operability, tumour diameter, PTV size, BED10 and age form the basis of a new risk stratification for OS in Stage I NSCLC patients treated with SABR that may help define subgroups for future clinical trials.

Poster
non-peer-reviewed

Predicting Survival Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy In Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Recursive Partitioning Analysis To Define Subgroups


Author Information

Alexander V. Louie Corresponding Author

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Ontario, CA


PDF Share